They’re pretty good when it comes to measuring calories burned, but with strength training, fitness bands need to do some work. That’s the verdict from researchers at Iowa State University, who tested four consumer fitness trackers – Fitbit Flex, Nike+ FuelBand SE, Jawbone UP 24 and Misfit Shine – to see how well they measured sedentary, aerobic and resistance activity. Two research monitors – the BodyMedia Core and Actigraph GT3X+ – were also included in the study. An Iowa State news release reports that the top performer, with an error rate of 15.3, was the BodyMedia Core.  The Misfit Shine was the least accurate with a 30.4 percent error rate. See how their performance stacked up below.
Overall results for each monitor: |
BodyMedia Core |
15.3 percent |
Actigraph GT3X+ |
16.7 percent |
Fitbit Flex |
16.8 percent |
Nike+ FuelBand SE |
17.1 percent |
Jawbone UP24 |
18.2 percent |
Misfit Shine |
30.4 percent |
Results for sedentary activity: |
BodyMedia Core |
15.7 percent |
Misfit Shine |
18.2 percent |
Nike+ FuelBand SE |
20.0 percent |
Fitbit Flex |
29.4 percent |
Jawbone UP24 |
29.4 percent |
Actigraph GT3X+ |
45.2 percent |
Results for resistance activity: |
Nike+ FuelBand SE |
20.0 percent |
BodyMedia Core |
29.2 percent |
Fitbit Flex |
31.6 percent |
Misfit Shine |
36.8 percent |
Actigraph GT3X+ |
45.2 percent |
Jawbone UP24 |
52.6 percent |
Results for aerobic activity: |
BodyMedia Core |
17.2 percent |
Nike+ FuelBand SE |
18.5 percent |
Actigraph GT3X+ |
22.1 percent |
Jawbone UP 24 |
30.0 percent |
Fitbit Flex |
34.7 percent |
Misfit Shine |
60.1 percent |