The truth is: exercise does not always take off weight. Sometimes it does. But sometimes it doesn’t. Jane Brody directs us to the August/September issue of ACE Certified News (published by the
American Council on Exercise), where Ralph La Forge, managing director of the
Duke Lipid and Disease Management Preceptorship Program at Duke
University Medical Center, has compiled a detailed analysis of the various
factors that influence the effect of exercise on weight loss. Here’s where it gets complicated, (readers are advised to read the entire story in the New York Times) but to make a more complicated story less complicated, several things greatly influence the number of calories burned during exercise. One is the type of activity you do. La Forge tell us that weight-bearing activities that work against gravity  aerobic
activities like walking, running, cross-country skiing, dancing,
skating and stair-climbing  use proportionately more calories at a
given level of effort than swimming, cycling or water aerobics. He also notes that how skilled you are at your chosen
activity also influences the calories burned. Those less skilled make
unnecessary movements or have to work harder at the activity, using
more calories an hour than those who perform it efficiently. That may
sound like it is an advantage to be unskilled, but there is a
significant downside: Those with less skill tend to tire faster and
thus spend less time at the activity. Another factor in caloric burn, says LaForge, is the increased
number of calories the body uses after a workout. Both aerobic and
resistance exercises raise energy expenditure over the next 12 to 24
hours, but the range is great  from 10 to 150 calories, depending on
the type of activity and how long and vigorously it was done. Finally, and most unfair, is genetic influence. Brody tell us that some people are born with a higher resting
metabolic rate or produce more fat-burning enzymes than others. People
with a low percentage of slow-twitch muscle fibers seem less able to
burn fat in skeletal muscles and thus may have a harder time losing
weight through exercise. Even more unfair, she says, women tend to burn more fat under the skin but have a harder time getting rid of abdominal fat than men do.
Yeah I have noticed and I am at the point now that I exercise mostly to keep hard to prevent flabbiness and also very good vascular wise. I have alot of energy when it comes to doing physical works and I feel good this way.
As for weight loss, I maintain myself at a certain weight and have been for years now. Lord help me If I was to loose 5 lbs. I know it would be hard for me but right now I am not over weighted and my body mass index is just right!
I exercise because it feels good and would do it even if it caused me to gain weight. In fact, I think I’m genetically wired for that to happen, putting on muscle (under the fat) pretty quickly, even at my age (59). When I’ve lost weight, I’ve increased the amount of exercise, but the key was de-stressing and generally feeling good so I ate less. Except for going from a desk job to full time manual labor, it’s nearly impossible for someone with a full time job to burn off enough to lose by exercise alone.
Have you turned people on to the USDA nutrient database?